will resume to update the blog in mid January.
Meanwhile ... Happy Holidays!
Monday, December 28, 2009
Swot Analysis For Kitchenaid
PAUSE
will resume to update the blog in mid January.
Meanwhile ... Happy Holidays!
will resume to update the blog in mid January.
Meanwhile ... Happy Holidays!
Sunday, December 6, 2009
Brazilian Wax Winston Salem Nc
BHOPAL
25 years ago, the flight of 40 tons of methyl isocyanate and hydrogen cyanide by the American multinational company, caused the deaths of thousands of people, 8000 in just three days.
This company belonged to the Union Caribe and the plant was in Bhopal, India.
To date, the victims are still waiting for justice. The
mggio 4, 1969, to Union Caribe is licensed to produce 5000 tons of pesticides a year by the Indian Ministry of Agriculture and since 1973, after the construction of plant in Bhopal, it started the production of methyl isocyanate, a basic component for Sevin, an insecticide that experimentally the corporation plans to produce numbers equal to 30,000 tons per year.
In 1982, however, the sale of this product as soon as he stopped to 2308 tonnes resulting in a sharp setback in the Caribbean Union which soon runs have strong shelters with staff reductions.
The following year, it brings better luck and forced to stop production and, subsequently, cut the costs of air security, turn off alarm systems, refrigeration of the tanks containing Mic (which must be kept at 0 °) and extinguishing the flame tower combustion, the last bastion to prevent the dispersion of gas in a possible escape.
"On the night of the disaster, the water used to wash the pipes entered the tank containing MIC through defective valves, triggering a reaction that led to the release of gas. The alarms did not go on.
Soon the population surrounding the plant, was reached by a toxic cloud provocative cough, chest pain, breathing difficulties, asthma, irritation of eyes, nose and throat, rashes, pulmonary edema or pneumonia, emphysema and hemorrhages. And death.
on this link to greenpeace , is a concise and effective history of the subsequent measures were taken forward after this tragedy and we can see that, twenty-five years later, the culprits have still not paid properly this mass murder, the number of victims continues to rise due to lack of land reclamation by the corporation, now Dow Chemical Company.
The Dow, in fact, has merged with Union Caribe, creating "the largest chemical industry, operating in 160 countries and a turnover of 57.7 billion dollars (since 2008). E 'responsible for the synthesis of some of the most hazardous compounds such as DDT, Agent Orange (used in the Vietnam War), the dibromocloropropano (a pesticide banned in America since 1978 because it is capable of causing cancer and sterility) and the pesticide Dursban (neurotoxin capable of altering the endocrine system). " ( http://www.greenpeace.it/bhopal/bhopal.php )
short, a beautiful aziendina, no?
If India seems so far away and therefore not very interesting, I noted that the Dow is also present in Italy with several manufacturing plants for various regions, including the production facility for plastic padding Enichem, located in plants in Porto Marghera, Brindisi, Priolo.
25 years away from the immediate death of 8000 people, the perpetrators continue to charge fine billion and Warren Anderson, the chairman of the then Union Caribe, a fugitive and wanted by Interpol, he lives in luxury in Bridgehampton, Long Island, New York. Is completely undisturbed.
Main:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Anderson_ 28chairman% 29%
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disastro_di_Bhopal
http://www.greenpeace .com / bhopal / cronologia.php
http://www.peacelink.it/ecologia/a/30717.html 
25 years ago, the flight of 40 tons of methyl isocyanate and hydrogen cyanide by the American multinational company, caused the deaths of thousands of people, 8000 in just three days.
This company belonged to the Union Caribe and the plant was in Bhopal, India.
To date, the victims are still waiting for justice. The
mggio 4, 1969, to Union Caribe is licensed to produce 5000 tons of pesticides a year by the Indian Ministry of Agriculture and since 1973, after the construction of plant in Bhopal, it started the production of methyl isocyanate, a basic component for Sevin, an insecticide that experimentally the corporation plans to produce numbers equal to 30,000 tons per year.
In 1982, however, the sale of this product as soon as he stopped to 2308 tonnes resulting in a sharp setback in the Caribbean Union which soon runs have strong shelters with staff reductions.
The following year, it brings better luck and forced to stop production and, subsequently, cut the costs of air security, turn off alarm systems, refrigeration of the tanks containing Mic (which must be kept at 0 °) and extinguishing the flame tower combustion, the last bastion to prevent the dispersion of gas in a possible escape.
"On the night of the disaster, the water used to wash the pipes entered the tank containing MIC through defective valves, triggering a reaction that led to the release of gas. The alarms did not go on.
Soon the population surrounding the plant, was reached by a toxic cloud provocative cough, chest pain, breathing difficulties, asthma, irritation of eyes, nose and throat, rashes, pulmonary edema or pneumonia, emphysema and hemorrhages. And death.
on this link to greenpeace , is a concise and effective history of the subsequent measures were taken forward after this tragedy and we can see that, twenty-five years later, the culprits have still not paid properly this mass murder, the number of victims continues to rise due to lack of land reclamation by the corporation, now Dow Chemical Company.
The Dow, in fact, has merged with Union Caribe, creating "the largest chemical industry, operating in 160 countries and a turnover of 57.7 billion dollars (since 2008). E 'responsible for the synthesis of some of the most hazardous compounds such as DDT, Agent Orange (used in the Vietnam War), the dibromocloropropano (a pesticide banned in America since 1978 because it is capable of causing cancer and sterility) and the pesticide Dursban (neurotoxin capable of altering the endocrine system). " ( http://www.greenpeace.it/bhopal/bhopal.php )
short, a beautiful aziendina, no?
If India seems so far away and therefore not very interesting, I noted that the Dow is also present in Italy with several manufacturing plants for various regions, including the production facility for plastic padding Enichem, located in plants in Porto Marghera, Brindisi, Priolo.
25 years away from the immediate death of 8000 people, the perpetrators continue to charge fine billion and Warren Anderson, the chairman of the then Union Caribe, a fugitive and wanted by Interpol, he lives in luxury in Bridgehampton, Long Island, New York. Is completely undisturbed.
Main:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Anderson_ 28chairman% 29%
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disastro_di_Bhopal
http://www.greenpeace .com / bhopal / cronologia.php
http://www.peacelink.it/ecologia/a/30717.html
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Monday, November 23, 2009
Is My Kidney Stone Stuck In My Ureter
PARABENS OKAY?
Lately, looking at some herbal products, I saw that many creams and tricks to be marked without parebeni.
From there the will to understand why this term is highlighted. Do not think that parabens are toxic?
premise that philosophy is that if ONE THING YOU CAN NOT SWALLOW WITHOUT SUFFERING DAMAGES, EVEN LESS IS BETTER THEN SPALMARSELA upon (our skin absorbs all the substances it comes into contact, then it's like the swallows). But try to be objective anyway.
First we must say that parabens are many and the main ones, or at least those that examine here are four: Methylparaben, Ethylparaben, Propylparaben, Butylparaben.
are most widely used in cosmetics such as creams, deodorants, shampoo, but maybe not everyone knows, are also used as additives food.
are preservatives and fungicides. But
briefly analyze one by one.
methylparaben (E 218)
paraben From the first, there may be a bit 'of contradictions, but it seems that this anti-irritant and antibacterial agent is considered a safe substance.
Despite this, however a small group of people have shown allergic reactions to this drug even though pairs like the one for those with sensitive skin.
http://www.ehow.com/about_4691068_what-is-methylparaben.html
Ethylparaben (E 214)
paraben Of this you have very little information around, but seems to be similar to the level methylparaben toxicity, ie little or absent.
Propylparaben (E219)
This preservative, however, is another story than the previous ones.
It is easier for this substance is irritating, and can particularly affect the eyes, skin, respiratory and intestinal tracts through, respectively, ingestion and inhalation.
addition, together with butyl paraben, studies have shown a potential risk to male fertility because it seems that both interfere with the reproductive cycle with the elimination of the sperm.
http://www.ehow.com/about_5375955_propylparaben-dangerous.html
Butylparaben (E 216)
More or less the same as shown above, propylparaben.
Butylparaben
However, please note that a study of tissue taken from women with breast cancer, found in 18/19 (the information on these two data range) of 20 samples, the presence of parabens. This probably can not prove a link between breast cancer and parabens but it certainly shows that they are accumulated in our bodies, and thus not ejected. This is not a good sign, especially as these preservatives may cause a slight impairment of the endocrine system.
As usual, when in doubt, I prefer BEWARE with parabens from deodorants.
Main:
http://www.eves-best.com/the-danger-of-parabens.htm
http://www.farmacovigilanza.org/cosmetovigilanza/news/0507-01.asp
http://www.iss.it/inte/aspe/cont.php?id=72&lang=1&tipo=5
http://www.fda.gov/Cosmetics/ProductandIngredientSafety/SelectedCosmeticIngredients/ucm128042.htm
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/efsa_locale-1178620753820_1178620761956.htm
Lately, looking at some herbal products, I saw that many creams and tricks to be marked without parebeni.
From there the will to understand why this term is highlighted. Do not think that parabens are toxic?
premise that philosophy is that if ONE THING YOU CAN NOT SWALLOW WITHOUT SUFFERING DAMAGES, EVEN LESS IS BETTER THEN SPALMARSELA upon (our skin absorbs all the substances it comes into contact, then it's like the swallows). But try to be objective anyway.
First we must say that parabens are many and the main ones, or at least those that examine here are four: Methylparaben, Ethylparaben, Propylparaben, Butylparaben.
are most widely used in cosmetics such as creams, deodorants, shampoo, but maybe not everyone knows, are also used as additives food.
are preservatives and fungicides. But
briefly analyze one by one.
methylparaben (E 218)
paraben From the first, there may be a bit 'of contradictions, but it seems that this anti-irritant and antibacterial agent is considered a safe substance.
Despite this, however a small group of people have shown allergic reactions to this drug even though pairs like the one for those with sensitive skin.
http://www.ehow.com/about_4691068_what-is-methylparaben.html
Ethylparaben (E 214)
paraben Of this you have very little information around, but seems to be similar to the level methylparaben toxicity, ie little or absent.
Propylparaben (E219)
This preservative, however, is another story than the previous ones.
It is easier for this substance is irritating, and can particularly affect the eyes, skin, respiratory and intestinal tracts through, respectively, ingestion and inhalation.
addition, together with butyl paraben, studies have shown a potential risk to male fertility because it seems that both interfere with the reproductive cycle with the elimination of the sperm.
http://www.ehow.com/about_5375955_propylparaben-dangerous.html
Butylparaben (E 216)
More or less the same as shown above, propylparaben.
Butylparaben
However, please note that a study of tissue taken from women with breast cancer, found in 18/19 (the information on these two data range) of 20 samples, the presence of parabens. This probably can not prove a link between breast cancer and parabens but it certainly shows that they are accumulated in our bodies, and thus not ejected. This is not a good sign, especially as these preservatives may cause a slight impairment of the endocrine system.
As usual, when in doubt, I prefer BEWARE with parabens from deodorants.
Main:
http://www.eves-best.com/the-danger-of-parabens.htm
http://www.farmacovigilanza.org/cosmetovigilanza/news/0507-01.asp
http://www.iss.it/inte/aspe/cont.php?id=72&lang=1&tipo=5
http://www.fda.gov/Cosmetics/ProductandIngredientSafety/SelectedCosmeticIngredients/ucm128042.htm
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/efsa_locale-1178620753820_1178620761956.htm
Saturday, November 7, 2009
Denise Milani Similar Models
SCALDIAMOCI THOUGHTS
in the best way to start the post dedicated to the place I love, MILAN (And others), it seems to me right away from Don Bosco (MMBrenta area).
There, in fact, did the library SCALDAPENSIERI-BOOKS FOR BOYS, by the will of the brave and amazing CRISTINA ZEPPINI, a pixie-haired red and soft as we know, even though she is so determined to pass himself off as a simple librarian, an artist, educator and actress, but if sentiste only a moment to speak, the more certainly believe my version since it has the ability to enchant and pamper you just crossed the threshold of the library.
After a few years, the library becomes the new SCALDAPENSIERI, expanding to 10 November 2007, with the entrance into society MAXIMUM ZERBELLONI also a fan of music theater and dad, well, books!
now also has a significant proportion of books for adults, but retains its historic identity of library SPECIALIZED FOR CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS, by the tremendous reception of the two that immediately thrusts you into dreamy timeless atmosphere that only books are able to give you, leaving open mouth with the snot nose, just like a child in front of the candy bar (at least to me, does this effect).
What is really amazing this library, however, what really sets it apart from all others, as well as highly competent owners, is that it has become a real gathering place for families, in a neighborhood that has been neglected for too long and now has found a concrete point of reference.
SCALDAPENSIERI go to the new, in fact, not just go buy a book, but separate from the newspaper to stop for a pleasant conversation, be in the presentations of emerging writers, publishers discover small, have the opportunity to participate in theater workshops, literary and music, and much more. It simply means to be rich.
(and then the Christian will always find, and I always say, the right book for you, the avid reader or not!)
That's why I really love this place. You always feel at HOME.
I therefore invite you all to fiondarvici and as the owner says to "touch, browse, smell, observe, read" the books that you will find it is the only way you can tell if a particular book is really for you. Tell the truth, where else will allow such a familiarity with the books?
And I challenge those who are not even going very fond of the printed and bound. You will be amazed: P
Main
http://www.nuovascaldapensieri.it/?page=7Z
in the best way to start the post dedicated to the place I love, MILAN (And others), it seems to me right away from Don Bosco (MMBrenta area).
There, in fact, did the library SCALDAPENSIERI-BOOKS FOR BOYS, by the will of the brave and amazing CRISTINA ZEPPINI, a pixie-haired red and soft as we know, even though she is so determined to pass himself off as a simple librarian, an artist, educator and actress, but if sentiste only a moment to speak, the more certainly believe my version since it has the ability to enchant and pamper you just crossed the threshold of the library.
After a few years, the library becomes the new SCALDAPENSIERI, expanding to 10 November 2007, with the entrance into society MAXIMUM ZERBELLONI also a fan of music theater and dad, well, books!
now also has a significant proportion of books for adults, but retains its historic identity of library SPECIALIZED FOR CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS, by the tremendous reception of the two that immediately thrusts you into dreamy timeless atmosphere that only books are able to give you, leaving open mouth with the snot nose, just like a child in front of the candy bar (at least to me, does this effect).
What is really amazing this library, however, what really sets it apart from all others, as well as highly competent owners, is that it has become a real gathering place for families, in a neighborhood that has been neglected for too long and now has found a concrete point of reference.
SCALDAPENSIERI go to the new, in fact, not just go buy a book, but separate from the newspaper to stop for a pleasant conversation, be in the presentations of emerging writers, publishers discover small, have the opportunity to participate in theater workshops, literary and music, and much more. It simply means to be rich.
(and then the Christian will always find, and I always say, the right book for you, the avid reader or not!)
That's why I really love this place. You always feel at HOME.
I therefore invite you all to fiondarvici and as the owner says to "touch, browse, smell, observe, read" the books that you will find it is the only way you can tell if a particular book is really for you. Tell the truth, where else will allow such a familiarity with the books?
And I challenge those who are not even going very fond of the printed and bound. You will be amazed: P
Main
http://www.nuovascaldapensieri.it/?page=7Z
Sunday, November 1, 2009
Does Black Gold And A Bright Red Gothic
# 1 ASPARTAME-E951
This post is a bit 'Lunghin, the I admit. But aspartame is a prime example of how the process is "enabling" of food additives (and how they experience, unfortunately, many power plays).
Aspartame is an artificial sweetener food additive that has created quite a few storms between the scientific communities.
was discovered in 1965 by James M. Schlatter, a chemist of GD Searle & Company (USA), which, after thorough this compound, has submitted to the FDA (Food and Drug Administration).
On June 26, 1974, the FDA allowed the use of aspartame in beverages alone, immediately sparking a petition of signatures on the part of Dr. Olney and lawyer Jim Turner to recall that decision.
This led, three years later, the FDA to initiate an investigation on the survey and data collected by Searle, by entrusting the investigation to the U.S. ATTORNEY OFFICE.
The first odd thing was born here. The then chief of detectives of the Attorney was hired seven months later at the law offices of Searle.
The investigation continued, however, managed to publish a report in which errors were reported in the documents about Searle's aspartame, but could not be completed because of budget constraints and time (time-barred, we would say today XD).
We must, then, wait until 1980 because aspartame is given the green light also food and, specifically, at the time of the then U.S. president Ronald Reagan who gave the charge to a certain Arthur Hull Hayes to review the position of aspartame. It was he, in fact, give consent to which this substance could also be used safely in food and beverages only.
The second curious thing is born from here. It is assumed by many that Hayes had some friends with Donald Rumsfeld, then President of GD Searle.
There must also be said, however, that on the other hand, many believed that the suspect was on the toxicity of aspartame only a ploy by some to bring down the shares of Searle and then removing them, a slice of the market for the benefit of others.
Even in this respect was an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission. I tried to go on your site and know how it is going to end, or if these assumptions was affirmative or negative, but, ahem .. there are a lot of documents, all in English and I should put there to groom for a while ' time, which tempts me not at all = __ =
The waters have remained more or less quiet until 2006 when the Ramazzini Foundation in Bologna found (I quote from Wikipedia), "the increased incidence of lymphomas and leukemias in female mice after intake of low doses of aspartame. "
The documents of the Foundation, together with all previous records of past investigations have been retouched concerned from EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) which responded that (I quote from the website of EFSA) "there was a need to review the outcome of the previous risk assessment and confirming the acceptable daily intake (ADI) for aspartame of 40 mg / kg bodyweight (bw ) "
This dose, it is worthwhile to keep in mind because you can not understand how this could, in my opinion, be checked because the producers BY LAW, DO NOT have any obligation to write the label ingredients, the measurement 'of aspartame inherent in their products (!!).
report here more faithfully and in detail by the EFSA's website, the findings that led to its decision about aspartame:
* The increased incidence of lymphomas / leukemias in treated rats was unrelated to aspartame, due to the high background incidence of chronic inflammatory changes in the lungs and the lack of a positive dose-response relationship. It is known that these tumors may develop in response to abnormal hyperplasia of lymphoid organs in the lungs of rats infected with diseases respiratory disease. The most plausible explanation of the results of this study with respect ailinfomi and leukemia is that they have developed in a colony suffering from chronic respiratory disease. The slight increase in the incidence of these tumors in rats fed aspartame is considered to be a fortuitous result of the ERF study and can therefore be ignored.
* The preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions of the renal pelvis, ureter and bladder observed mainly in female rats along with renal calcification were most probably related to treatment, at least at higher doses. It is widely recognized that this is an effect due to the high dose of irritant chemicals or chemicals responsible for the calcification of the renal pelvis as a result of imbalances in calcium metabolism, to the rat. The Panel considers that these effects are of no relevance to humans.
* The data on total malignant tumors are not sufficient to demonstrate a carcinogenic potential of aspartame. In the opinion of the Panel that the aggregation of all cancers or all of the animals suffering from malignant tumors for statistical purposes is not justified, since, as stated above, the lymphomas and leukemias, first , and renal tumors, on the other hand, should be excluded from the analysis.
* Concerning the malignant schwannomas, the Panel notes that the number of tumors is low, the dose-response relationship, while showing a positive statistical trend in males, is very flat over a wide range dosages, there is also uncertainty about the diagnosis of these tumors. The Panel concludes that this result can be fully assessed only after an independent review of all histopathologic preparations of the nervous system of the ERF study and if appropriate, also of historical controls.
highlights once again how, at the end of the day, totally unnecessary animal testing, since, it seems to me in the eyes of all, can not lead to any results, but only certain food interests of either party. This, of course, is a general discussion and does not refer necessarily to the case mentioned in this post.
Well, what to say. It 'amazing how a little thing that is part of our daily lives of consumers, that hides a troubled history.
If I made any mistakes or inaccuracies, please let me know.
Main and sources used
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/efsa_locale-1178620753820_1178620765743.htm
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspartame
http: / / www.ramazzini.it/fondazione/newsDetail.asp?id=18
http://www.disinformazione.it/aspartame5.htm
http://italia.aspartame.info/Default.asp 
This post is a bit 'Lunghin, the I admit. But aspartame is a prime example of how the process is "enabling" of food additives (and how they experience, unfortunately, many power plays).
Aspartame is an artificial sweetener food additive that has created quite a few storms between the scientific communities.
was discovered in 1965 by James M. Schlatter, a chemist of GD Searle & Company (USA), which, after thorough this compound, has submitted to the FDA (Food and Drug Administration).
On June 26, 1974, the FDA allowed the use of aspartame in beverages alone, immediately sparking a petition of signatures on the part of Dr. Olney and lawyer Jim Turner to recall that decision.
This led, three years later, the FDA to initiate an investigation on the survey and data collected by Searle, by entrusting the investigation to the U.S. ATTORNEY OFFICE.
The first odd thing was born here. The then chief of detectives of the Attorney was hired seven months later at the law offices of Searle.
The investigation continued, however, managed to publish a report in which errors were reported in the documents about Searle's aspartame, but could not be completed because of budget constraints and time (time-barred, we would say today XD).
We must, then, wait until 1980 because aspartame is given the green light also food and, specifically, at the time of the then U.S. president Ronald Reagan who gave the charge to a certain Arthur Hull Hayes to review the position of aspartame. It was he, in fact, give consent to which this substance could also be used safely in food and beverages only.
The second curious thing is born from here. It is assumed by many that Hayes had some friends with Donald Rumsfeld, then President of GD Searle.
There must also be said, however, that on the other hand, many believed that the suspect was on the toxicity of aspartame only a ploy by some to bring down the shares of Searle and then removing them, a slice of the market for the benefit of others.
Even in this respect was an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission. I tried to go on your site and know how it is going to end, or if these assumptions was affirmative or negative, but, ahem .. there are a lot of documents, all in English and I should put there to groom for a while ' time, which tempts me not at all = __ =
The waters have remained more or less quiet until 2006 when the Ramazzini Foundation in Bologna found (I quote from Wikipedia), "the increased incidence of lymphomas and leukemias in female mice after intake of low doses of aspartame. "
The documents of the Foundation, together with all previous records of past investigations have been retouched concerned from EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) which responded that (I quote from the website of EFSA) "there was a need to review the outcome of the previous risk assessment and confirming the acceptable daily intake (ADI) for aspartame of 40 mg / kg bodyweight (bw ) "
This dose, it is worthwhile to keep in mind because you can not understand how this could, in my opinion, be checked because the producers BY LAW, DO NOT have any obligation to write the label ingredients, the measurement 'of aspartame inherent in their products (!!).
report here more faithfully and in detail by the EFSA's website, the findings that led to its decision about aspartame:
* The increased incidence of lymphomas / leukemias in treated rats was unrelated to aspartame, due to the high background incidence of chronic inflammatory changes in the lungs and the lack of a positive dose-response relationship. It is known that these tumors may develop in response to abnormal hyperplasia of lymphoid organs in the lungs of rats infected with diseases respiratory disease. The most plausible explanation of the results of this study with respect ailinfomi and leukemia is that they have developed in a colony suffering from chronic respiratory disease. The slight increase in the incidence of these tumors in rats fed aspartame is considered to be a fortuitous result of the ERF study and can therefore be ignored.
* The preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions of the renal pelvis, ureter and bladder observed mainly in female rats along with renal calcification were most probably related to treatment, at least at higher doses. It is widely recognized that this is an effect due to the high dose of irritant chemicals or chemicals responsible for the calcification of the renal pelvis as a result of imbalances in calcium metabolism, to the rat. The Panel considers that these effects are of no relevance to humans.
* The data on total malignant tumors are not sufficient to demonstrate a carcinogenic potential of aspartame. In the opinion of the Panel that the aggregation of all cancers or all of the animals suffering from malignant tumors for statistical purposes is not justified, since, as stated above, the lymphomas and leukemias, first , and renal tumors, on the other hand, should be excluded from the analysis.
* Concerning the malignant schwannomas, the Panel notes that the number of tumors is low, the dose-response relationship, while showing a positive statistical trend in males, is very flat over a wide range dosages, there is also uncertainty about the diagnosis of these tumors. The Panel concludes that this result can be fully assessed only after an independent review of all histopathologic preparations of the nervous system of the ERF study and if appropriate, also of historical controls.
highlights once again how, at the end of the day, totally unnecessary animal testing, since, it seems to me in the eyes of all, can not lead to any results, but only certain food interests of either party. This, of course, is a general discussion and does not refer necessarily to the case mentioned in this post.
Well, what to say. It 'amazing how a little thing that is part of our daily lives of consumers, that hides a troubled history.
If I made any mistakes or inaccuracies, please let me know.
Main and sources used
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/efsa_locale-1178620753820_1178620765743.htm
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspartame
http: / / www.ramazzini.it/fondazione/newsDetail.asp?id=18
http://www.disinformazione.it/aspartame5.htm
http://italia.aspartame.info/Default.asp
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Cube Field Game Descargar
ADDITIVES IN THIS MEMORY! Zoes
At school, alongside the teaching of languages foreign, should also teach to read the labels of ingredients that are products, whether food or otherwise.
This is because it is extremely important to know what you INGURGITA or what is lava. At least I think so:)
I decided then to begin to know what really lies behind the various para propyl phospho silicate contribution at the time, my ears have the same meaning as Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious.
The blog becomes a great excuse to overcome laziness and start browsing around the net and learn a bit 'of things. Surely
of food additives, for better or worse, we heard about it. They are easily recognized by their classification number with E (at least in Europe, other countries, there are only numbers). Now, however, there is a tendency to write them in full so that our eyes are often disguised inattentive
For food additive is defined as "any substance not normally consumed as a food in itself and not normally used as a characteristic ingredient of food, regardless of whether it has nutritive value, the intentional addition to food for a technological purpose in the manufacture, processing, preparation, processing, packaging, transport or storage of food, may be reasonably expected to become, itself or its products, a component of such foods, either directly or indirectly "( Council Directive 89/107/EEC).
can be divided roughly into three groups:
additives used to preserve the freshness of the food (preservatives and antioxidants);
Additives to improve the appearance and taste of food (dyes, thickeners, emulsifiers, sweeteners, flavor enhancers)
technological additives used to facilitate food processing (anti-foaming agents, anti-caking agents etc.).
The information I have obtained simply by going on Wikipedia, where there is a beautiful table that is assigned for good!
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Additivi_alimentari
But where are these additives?
Staying in Europe once discovered a substance that is suspected to be introduced as an additive in the food industry, the aims with all of its documentation, the European Community which, in turn, leaves the evaluation to an organization European air traffic control called EFSA, namely The European Food Safety Authority. EFSA has the task of assessing the risks of substances to be introduced into the food market and to give, then, whether or not to consent to its use.
Internationally, however, are supervisory bodies perposti the JECFA (Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives), FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) and the 'WHO (World Health Organization).
Despite these organs of control, food additives are often involved in various disputes on their hazards and toxicity, and effects that can produce the body in the long run.
Surfing the net, there are numerous tables that can be downloaded easily, on Food Additives, divided by their alleged toxicity more or less serious, or nothing.
Personally I have different views, comparing them with each other and I have found great differences.
are still to be taken with pliers because you never have absolute certainty. But have a little something in hand is better than nothing.
http://www.vegan3000.info/
http://it.geocities.com/claupalm/Resto/Documents/additivi.html
This downloadable chart is dated 2000/2001 and collects a ' set of public information obtained from various sources.
Keep in mind that it is difficult to find an updated and accurate, as stated just above. Especially now that EFSA is double-checking many additives have already entered the "market", especially dyes (but more on that later).
WARNING: Keep in mind that is always right listen to more and more bells possible about a given topic, so you have the most complete information possible.
I have no expertise in chemistry. Therefore, I limit myself to a summary PURELY for personal information based on various information collected around which I will care as much as possible to provide the link. NEXT POST
about: aspartame. 
At school, alongside the teaching of languages foreign, should also teach to read the labels of ingredients that are products, whether food or otherwise.
This is because it is extremely important to know what you INGURGITA or what is lava. At least I think so:)
I decided then to begin to know what really lies behind the various para propyl phospho silicate contribution at the time, my ears have the same meaning as Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious.
The blog becomes a great excuse to overcome laziness and start browsing around the net and learn a bit 'of things. Surely
of food additives, for better or worse, we heard about it. They are easily recognized by their classification number with E (at least in Europe, other countries, there are only numbers). Now, however, there is a tendency to write them in full so that our eyes are often disguised inattentive
For food additive is defined as "any substance not normally consumed as a food in itself and not normally used as a characteristic ingredient of food, regardless of whether it has nutritive value, the intentional addition to food for a technological purpose in the manufacture, processing, preparation, processing, packaging, transport or storage of food, may be reasonably expected to become, itself or its products, a component of such foods, either directly or indirectly "( Council Directive 89/107/EEC).
can be divided roughly into three groups:
additives used to preserve the freshness of the food (preservatives and antioxidants);
Additives to improve the appearance and taste of food (dyes, thickeners, emulsifiers, sweeteners, flavor enhancers)
technological additives used to facilitate food processing (anti-foaming agents, anti-caking agents etc.).
The information I have obtained simply by going on Wikipedia, where there is a beautiful table that is assigned for good!
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Additivi_alimentari
But where are these additives?
Staying in Europe once discovered a substance that is suspected to be introduced as an additive in the food industry, the aims with all of its documentation, the European Community which, in turn, leaves the evaluation to an organization European air traffic control called EFSA, namely The European Food Safety Authority. EFSA has the task of assessing the risks of substances to be introduced into the food market and to give, then, whether or not to consent to its use.
Internationally, however, are supervisory bodies perposti the JECFA (Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives), FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) and the 'WHO (World Health Organization).
Despite these organs of control, food additives are often involved in various disputes on their hazards and toxicity, and effects that can produce the body in the long run.
Surfing the net, there are numerous tables that can be downloaded easily, on Food Additives, divided by their alleged toxicity more or less serious, or nothing.
Personally I have different views, comparing them with each other and I have found great differences.
are still to be taken with pliers because you never have absolute certainty. But have a little something in hand is better than nothing.
http://www.vegan3000.info/
http://it.geocities.com/claupalm/Resto/Documents/additivi.html
This downloadable chart is dated 2000/2001 and collects a ' set of public information obtained from various sources.
Keep in mind that it is difficult to find an updated and accurate, as stated just above. Especially now that EFSA is double-checking many additives have already entered the "market", especially dyes (but more on that later).
WARNING: Keep in mind that is always right listen to more and more bells possible about a given topic, so you have the most complete information possible.
I have no expertise in chemistry. Therefore, I limit myself to a summary PURELY for personal information based on various information collected around which I will care as much as possible to provide the link. NEXT POST
about: aspartame.
Saturday, October 24, 2009
Are Whippets Bad For You
Several months ago I went to the fair in Milan MAKES THE RIGHT THING (this year will be held on 12 - 13 - 14 March 2010) and I found myself in front of a booth that promoted zoes area fairly sustainable.
MA Zoes what?
a genial XD
In a time when social networks are all the rage, popping out like mushrooms (see my space, twitter that I personally love for her disarming simplicity, facebook, flickr, etc. ..), the Cultural Foundation LIABILITY 'Ethical and Fondazione Sistema Toscana, have had the wonderful idea of \u200b\u200bcreating a virtual platform in the same way a social network but with very different purposes. On
Zoes, in fact, you create your own profile, make friend requests and exchange messages, but the purpose is not to simply socialize, but to create a community of people who share the same desire to create a more inclusive economy and wants to build a future based more on social and environmental justice through knowledge of resources needed to implement it.
The user who logs on zoes for the first time, you will be faced with a list of skills which has the complete freedom to report on what is experienced (either for work or hobbies) or of which are simply curious. This is because, upon joining the community, when a person will make an application shouts something on your expertise, you'll get a warning that you will report that request. At this point, you will have the opportunity to respond, along with all other people, like you, have reported this issue as to jurisdiction.
This creates a constant exchange where the knowledge of experienced people and industry is to assist those in need of answers with regard to a variety of topics such as, for example, green building, critical consumption, responsible tourism, natural cosmetics ... and much more. In short, all information that certainly will not find easily around.
In addition to this important function, inside there is also the possibility to join or create groups and blogs, promoting campaigns. Moreover, even companies having the opportunity to enroll if, for example, I want to install photovoltaic cells, can apply to a company that takes care of this for more information as well as people of the community who may have already installed.
If activated at full capacity, then, zoes can 'be really useful and really shake the multinationals and, in general, conventional systems whose fortune is just to give us to drink that the alternatives do not exist. Zoes
gives you the opportunity to learn and then activated to be as independent as possible and masters of their own economy.
course is to explain one thing (in fact this post was a frenzy to write, so I thought it was on difficiel explain fnzioni a site!), Try another ... so what you waiting for?
There is absolutely committed as a facebook, and even if you remain inactive for a long time, no one criticizes anything.
Ah, the themes that will be divided into: Living & Building
Food & Agriculture Finance & Saving Energy & Eco-efficiency
& Politics Health & Fitness Participation
Rights & Social Networks
Knowledge & Communications Travel & Hospitality Manufacturing & Responsibility
as defective, maybe it's a bit 'slow (but who knows, maybe also depends on my computer or connection). Either way helps us to have patience as we always used to everything at once! gnak gnak:)
Main:
http://www.zoes.it/it/zoes-e
http://andreatj.wordpress.com/2008/10/28/intervista-a-ugo -Bigger-the-bank-ethics-the-presentation-of-the-zoes-platform-for-sustainable-Lequio /
http://www.ecoblog.it/post/7181/in-arrivo-zoes- In-the-deck-and-the-Lequio sustainable
§
the best knowledge is curiosity §
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Masterbation In Muslim Women
CICERCHIA
How do you not marry a man who gives you a flat so after a long day, not just the best?
But let's start from the beginning.
A friend of mine a while back, keen to pulses, advised me to try the counters, food that I had never heard of.
I found a few days later, just ahead of a pack of cicerchie watching me from the top of a shelf of a health food store so I decided to take them and cook them.
thrust of my usual curiosity (not to call cazzeggiano chronic), I looked at the web, gathering information here and there ... and to my horror I discovered that this legume nice little surprise hidden in the small bowel.
Its seeds, in fact, contain so many proteins, but also a neurotoxin in variable amounts, in the form of an amino acid β-N-Oxalyl-L-α, β-diaminopropionico acid or ODAP.
It is believed that the latter is the cause of a disease called latir, a disease that causes paralysis of the legs, which if not treated in time, can 'become irreversible. This
'was discovered when the latir spread considerably among people whose diet was based on this very legume, very popular in Italy some time ago (now it is grown only in central regions).
If consummated, and, rarely, there is no need to panic too much. Some recommend putting CICERCHIA to soak in salted water overnight and rinse it thoroughly because water takes away most of the toxic substances. Also kitchen for two hours.
All rules that, in my ignorance, I and my boyfriend we did not follow, of course.
Now the question springs to mind, regarding the photo just above: He knew? The answer may
'completely change the first two lines I wrote in this post: D
But there's more! Continuing
to seek more information on the counters, I have sprung up before the eyes of many sites that promote, however, this legume as very beneficial for its organoleptic properties and the presence of vitamins B1, B2 and PP, calcium, phosphorus and fiber.
In these two versions, all that remains is an average and make us go cautiously with this legume, consuming only very occasionally (the taste, however, is really good, is to say), especially now that back into favor and that many companies key on the tradition (sic) to return to place it very well in the market.
Enjoy (??!!)
Main
http://www.europass.parma.it/page.asp?IDCategoria=553&IDSezione=0&ID=94363
http://guide.supereva.it/oligoterapia/interventi/2001/11/79328.shtml
http://www.estravagario.org/index.php?view=article&catid=48% 3Aarticoli & id = 100 % 3Acicerchia & option = com_content & Itemid = 75
§ are what we eat. And I do not aspire to be a murderer § 
How do you not marry a man who gives you a flat so after a long day, not just the best?
But let's start from the beginning.
A friend of mine a while back, keen to pulses, advised me to try the counters, food that I had never heard of.
I found a few days later, just ahead of a pack of cicerchie watching me from the top of a shelf of a health food store so I decided to take them and cook them.
thrust of my usual curiosity (not to call cazzeggiano chronic), I looked at the web, gathering information here and there ... and to my horror I discovered that this legume nice little surprise hidden in the small bowel.
Its seeds, in fact, contain so many proteins, but also a neurotoxin in variable amounts, in the form of an amino acid β-N-Oxalyl-L-α, β-diaminopropionico acid or ODAP.
It is believed that the latter is the cause of a disease called latir, a disease that causes paralysis of the legs, which if not treated in time, can 'become irreversible. This
'was discovered when the latir spread considerably among people whose diet was based on this very legume, very popular in Italy some time ago (now it is grown only in central regions).
If consummated, and, rarely, there is no need to panic too much. Some recommend putting CICERCHIA to soak in salted water overnight and rinse it thoroughly because water takes away most of the toxic substances. Also kitchen for two hours.
All rules that, in my ignorance, I and my boyfriend we did not follow, of course.
Now the question springs to mind, regarding the photo just above: He knew? The answer may
'completely change the first two lines I wrote in this post: D
But there's more! Continuing
to seek more information on the counters, I have sprung up before the eyes of many sites that promote, however, this legume as very beneficial for its organoleptic properties and the presence of vitamins B1, B2 and PP, calcium, phosphorus and fiber.
In these two versions, all that remains is an average and make us go cautiously with this legume, consuming only very occasionally (the taste, however, is really good, is to say), especially now that back into favor and that many companies key on the tradition (sic) to return to place it very well in the market.
Enjoy (??!!)
Main
http://www.europass.parma.it/page.asp?IDCategoria=553&IDSezione=0&ID=94363
http://guide.supereva.it/oligoterapia/interventi/2001/11/79328.shtml
http://www.estravagario.org/index.php?view=article&catid=48% 3Aarticoli & id = 100 % 3Acicerchia & option = com_content & Itemid = 75
§ are what we eat. And I do not aspire to be a murderer §
Monday, October 19, 2009
Misty Mundae Spiderbabe
THE MYSTERY OF WHAT YOU PUT IN THE MOUTH?
I like to wear makeup.
take those ten minutes before the mirror and paint the face according to the mood of the evening or as needed.
But this can not at the expense of a lifetime!
Wrap a lipstick or an eyeshadow tested on animals is equivalent to accept torture, to accept that living things are made of any experiments that involve the inevitable agony until death.
Equivalent to wear the blood of innocent creatures. Every touch of blush, each coated with foundation, mascara every pass is a quiet yes to every drop of blood that is poured over the animal testing in cosmetics.
Animals (but we should remember every time that we too are animals and we must continue is absurd distinction between "us" and "they are given "??!!) creams and compounds of any kind, whether oral or respiratory to test the toxicity and poisoning.
The question then comes to mind: but are they really necessary?
remaining in the field of cosmetics alone (but this could be extended to any field), the fact of testing the toxicity of certain substances on animals, has absolutely no effect. And this for one simple reason. Each species, in fact, reacts differently to substances. Example.
It was found that dioxin is very toxic to rats and guinea pigs but completely harmless for the hamster. This shows that there is nothing that can be expected if the substance is toxic or not for man, but you can only know at the same time when they come into contact with it. The first tests on other animal species, therefore, are totally useless!
But why companies continue with the test? By now we should be weaned
enough to understand that big companies, multinationals in particular, if they can save money to gain a lot, would sell without any hesitation even their mothers. So
companies take advantage of this opportunity simply because this way they can test a toxic substance and sentenced or not, depending on their needs (see previous discussion on dioxin), allowing you to make legal any plaster on the market they wish. Furthermore, research conducted on animals rather than humans, have an outlet in the publications much faster and easier.
And last but not least, a classic Italian has always done well, why change?
Despite all the conditions here very briefly and concisely set out, many women shrug pulling out the classic excuse that the system is so and we can not do anything. Do not wear makeup, then, is unthinkable .. even for me.
WRONG!
To our great grace, to be in 2009 and in 1200 was a great success, as many associations, with great fights, they got many steps to prevent animal testing. Added to this is the consciousness of many cosmetic companies that have decided to say stop to this barbarism!
Below I give you two links where you can find companies that have decided not to test on animals, and (important thing) Commission to third parties or NOT to buy the ingredients for those who carry them out.
http://demo.lav.nethouse.it/index.php?id=716
http://www.gocrueltyfree.org/b_shopcrueltyfree.php
In any case, even though there is controlled This bullet markers
And beware of such written
Not tested on animals if it does not appear in the lists of the LAV, for example, because it means that the finished product was not tested, but the ingredients yes.
As you can see there are many companies (and some well-known and readily available, Erbolario see, for example). Nothing prohibits
then going to write a subsidiary in health food stores or health food store like NaturaSì, where many cosmetic products comply with the fees listed above and therefore life.
NOTHING TO RAISE shrugged, then. Once you know that behind us is a beautiful lipstick BLOOD AND SUFFERING OF LIFE, you only have two paths to follow: continue to close our eyes to be instigators of murder (because that is YOU DECIDE ABOUT FINANCE), or knock a little bit more and be careful what products to buy. The choices we ALWAYS!
Main:
http://search.caringconsumer.com/ http://www.lav.it/index.php?id=174 http://www.icea.info/Aree/ CertificazioniNoFood/Cosmetici/tabid/131/Default.aspx
§ It's not that I love animals, is that I feel part of their § 
I like to wear makeup.
take those ten minutes before the mirror and paint the face according to the mood of the evening or as needed.
But this can not at the expense of a lifetime!
Wrap a lipstick or an eyeshadow tested on animals is equivalent to accept torture, to accept that living things are made of any experiments that involve the inevitable agony until death.
Equivalent to wear the blood of innocent creatures. Every touch of blush, each coated with foundation, mascara every pass is a quiet yes to every drop of blood that is poured over the animal testing in cosmetics.
Animals (but we should remember every time that we too are animals and we must continue is absurd distinction between "us" and "they are given "??!!) creams and compounds of any kind, whether oral or respiratory to test the toxicity and poisoning.
The question then comes to mind: but are they really necessary?
remaining in the field of cosmetics alone (but this could be extended to any field), the fact of testing the toxicity of certain substances on animals, has absolutely no effect. And this for one simple reason. Each species, in fact, reacts differently to substances. Example.
It was found that dioxin is very toxic to rats and guinea pigs but completely harmless for the hamster. This shows that there is nothing that can be expected if the substance is toxic or not for man, but you can only know at the same time when they come into contact with it. The first tests on other animal species, therefore, are totally useless!
But why companies continue with the test? By now we should be weaned
enough to understand that big companies, multinationals in particular, if they can save money to gain a lot, would sell without any hesitation even their mothers. So
companies take advantage of this opportunity simply because this way they can test a toxic substance and sentenced or not, depending on their needs (see previous discussion on dioxin), allowing you to make legal any plaster on the market they wish. Furthermore, research conducted on animals rather than humans, have an outlet in the publications much faster and easier.
And last but not least, a classic Italian has always done well, why change?
Despite all the conditions here very briefly and concisely set out, many women shrug pulling out the classic excuse that the system is so and we can not do anything. Do not wear makeup, then, is unthinkable .. even for me.
WRONG!
To our great grace, to be in 2009 and in 1200 was a great success, as many associations, with great fights, they got many steps to prevent animal testing. Added to this is the consciousness of many cosmetic companies that have decided to say stop to this barbarism!
Below I give you two links where you can find companies that have decided not to test on animals, and (important thing) Commission to third parties or NOT to buy the ingredients for those who carry them out.
http://demo.lav.nethouse.it/index.php?id=716
http://www.gocrueltyfree.org/b_shopcrueltyfree.php
In any case, even though there is controlled This bullet markers
And beware of such written
Not tested on animals if it does not appear in the lists of the LAV, for example, because it means that the finished product was not tested, but the ingredients yes.
As you can see there are many companies (and some well-known and readily available, Erbolario see, for example). Nothing prohibits
then going to write a subsidiary in health food stores or health food store like NaturaSì, where many cosmetic products comply with the fees listed above and therefore life.
NOTHING TO RAISE shrugged, then. Once you know that behind us is a beautiful lipstick BLOOD AND SUFFERING OF LIFE, you only have two paths to follow: continue to close our eyes to be instigators of murder (because that is YOU DECIDE ABOUT FINANCE), or knock a little bit more and be careful what products to buy. The choices we ALWAYS!
Main:
http://search.caringconsumer.com/ http://www.lav.it/index.php?id=174 http://www.icea.info/Aree/ CertificazioniNoFood/Cosmetici/tabid/131/Default.aspx
§ It's not that I love animals, is that I feel part of their §
Monday, July 6, 2009
Women's Bmi Vs Age Uk
We invite you to our spiritual meetings.
This year's theme is the encounter with Jesus through the experience that has made San Francisco.
Next is' Sunday, November 15, 2009
This year's theme is the encounter with Jesus through the experience that has made San Francisco.
Next is' Sunday, November 15, 2009
Here is the flyer:
Monday, June 1, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)